I spend a lot of time in my research reading what politicians have to say about one issue or another. There are often reasons to doubt that they are being entirely (or even at all) sincere. But generally they are at least saying something.
I just heard an ad on the radio for some medicine (I don't even remember what kind of medicine), which included, near the end, a statement along the following lines: "People who have been addicted to alcohol or other drugs may be more likely to become addicted to this product." Note the "may" — in effect, this sentence says absolutely nothing. Presumably it satisfies some legal requirement somewhere, but I can't imagine what.
I have a similar gripe with the very common sale announcements along the lines of "you could save up to 15% or more" — again, what information is being conveyed here? Taken literally, the statement is beyond meaningless: you could replace the "could" with "will" and it would still be true. I suppose the goal is to convey a particular focal point (15%) to listeners, but wouldn't there be better (less meaningless) ways to say this?
Scattered musings on current affairs issues that touch on my main research interests: international political economy, European integration, development, human rights, as well as international relations and politics in general.
Disclaimer: Any views expressed here are mine alone, and not representative of or endorsed by William & Mary.
Friday, June 14, 2013
Tuesday, June 4, 2013
Terrorism, safety, and statistics
Just a juxtaposition of a few items:
A cartoon: "This is why people should learn statistics"
Joe Nocera's "Gun Report", a blog with daily examples of gun deaths.
John Mueller and Mark Stewart's "The terrorism delusion: America's overwrought response to September 11", published last year in International Security.
A cartoon: "This is why people should learn statistics"
Joe Nocera's "Gun Report", a blog with daily examples of gun deaths.
John Mueller and Mark Stewart's "The terrorism delusion: America's overwrought response to September 11", published last year in International Security.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)